 |
||
|
6.9
|
Nokia – Scores maximum points for its comprehensive voluntary take-back programme. More | |
|
5.9
|
Sony Ericsson – Scores points for its new environmental warranty, guaranteeing take-back and recycling for individual products regardless of location. More | |
|
5.9
|
Toshiba- Toshiba climbs to 3rd gaining extra points on the energy criteria; it is now reporting its use of renewable energy. More | |
|
5.9
|
Samsung - Good on toxic chemicals and energy but very poor on recycling. More | |
|
5.7
|
Fujitsu Siemens - Good on energy, scores poorly on electronic waste. More | |
|
5.7
|
LGE - Improved score on recycling and energy. More | |
|
5.3
|
Motorola - Improved score on energy, waste and recycling. More | |
|
5.3
|
Sony - Still has room for improvement on energy. More | |
|
5.1
|
Panasonic - Scores maximum points on energy but still scores poorly on all e-waste criteria. More | |
|
4.9
|
Sharp - Improved energy policy but reporting of energy efficiency of its products continues to be weak. |
|
|
4.7
|
Acer - Needs to improve on reducing toxic chemicals and recycling. More | |
|
4.7
|
Dell - Loses points for withdrawing from its commitment to eliminate all PVC plastic and brominated flame retardants (BFRs) by the end of 2009. More | |
|
4.5
|
HP - Still needs to improve on e-waste. More | |
|
4.3
|
Apple - Now reporting product carbon footprint and new iPods are free of both PVC and BFRs. More | |
|
4.1
|
Philips - Scores well on toxics and energy but scores zero on most other e-waste criteria. More | |
|
3.7
|
Lenovo - Scores well on toxic chemicals, poor on recycling and energy. More | |
|
2.9
|
Microsoft - Still scores poorly on recycling and energy. More | |
|
0.8
|
Nintendo - Zero on most criteria except chemicals management and energy. More |
另外他们还公布了2008年最绿色的电子产品：
